Rating criteria · digestive system

IBS and GERD — how VA rates them

The percentages, and the exact words VA measures you against. I rewrote this page because the chart most people are passing around is running on the old rules.

Read the date first. Everything below is 38 CFR 4.114, criteria effective May 19, 2024. VA rewrote the whole digestive schedule on that date. Most charts floating around mix the old rules and the new ones on one sheet with no date on it, and that mix is how a Soldier or a Family ends up filing against a standard that no longer exists. If a chart you are holding has no effective date on it, do not trust it.
IBS

Irritable bowel syndrome — diagnostic code 7319

10%, 20%, 30%. Thirty percent is the top of this code.

  • 10% — Abdominal pain related to defecation at least one day during the previous three months; and two or more of the six symptoms listed below.
  • 20% — Abdominal pain related to defecation for at least three days per month during the previous three months; and two or more of the six symptoms below.
  • 30% — Abdominal pain related to defecation at least one day per week during the previous three months; and two or more of the six symptoms below.
The only thing that changes between 10, 20 and 30 is how often the pain comes. The symptom requirement is the same two-of-six at every level. There is no "significant functional impairment" test and no "most severe" test in this code. If a chart told you that, it was adding a bar the regulation does not set.
The six symptoms are a closed list. Two or more of: (1) change in stool frequency, (2) change in stool form, (3) altered stool passage — straining and/or urgency, (4) mucorrhea — mucus in the stool, (5) abdominal bloating, (6) subjective distension — feeling swollen or distended. That is the whole list. "Diarrhea" and "constipation" are not items on it — they count only as a change in stool frequency or a change in stool form. An exam that documents symptoms outside these six does not satisfy the criterion, so make sure your provider's words land inside it.
★ Frequency of pain, plus two of six.
GERD

GERD and esophageal stricture — diagnostic code 7206

0%, 10%, 30%, 50%, 80%.

Know this before you read the levels. Under DC 7206 as rewritten May 19, 2024, every level is built around a documented esophageal stricture — a narrowing of the food pipe. With no documented stricture, the evaluation is 0% no matter how bad the reflux is. Daily heartburn medication by itself does not earn 10% under this code.
  • 0% — Documented history of esophageal stricture(s) without daily symptoms or requirement for daily medications.
  • 10% — Documented history of esophageal stricture(s) that requires daily medications to control dysphagia (trouble swallowing), otherwise asymptomatic.
  • 30% — Recurrent esophageal stricture(s) causing dysphagia which requires dilatation up to two times per year.
  • 50% — Documented history of recurrent or refractory esophageal stricture(s) causing dysphagia which requires at least one of: (1) dilatation 3 or more times per year, (2) dilatation using steroids at least one time per year, or (3) esophageal stent placement.
  • 80% — Documented history of recurrent or refractory esophageal stricture(s) causing dysphagia with at least one of: (1) aspiration, (2) undernutrition, and/or (3) substantial weight loss as defined by 38 CFR 4.112(a); and treatment with either surgical correction of the stricture(s) or a percutaneous esophago-gastrointestinal tube (PEG tube — a feeding tube placed through the belly wall).
Two places a narrow reading costs money. At 50%, the standard is not "frequent" dilatation — three dilatations in a year, or one steroid dilatation in a year, is enough. At 80%, you do not need aspiration and undernutrition and weight loss. You need one of those three, plus the surgery or the PEG tube. A veteran with aspiration and a PEG tube meets 80%. And "substantial weight loss" is a defined term under 38 CFR 4.112(a) — it is not the rater's opinion, so have your provider measure it against that definition.
★ No stricture in the file, no rating.
GERD — the fine print

The notes under 7206 decide the claim

These are part of the code. Raters apply them. Most charts leave them off.

  • Note (1) — the evidence. Findings must be documented by barium swallow, computerized tomography (CT), or esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD — a scope passed down the throat). This whole code now turns on a documented stricture, so get that report into your file before you file.
  • Note (2). Non-gastrointestinal complications of procedures are rated under the appropriate body system.
  • Note (4) — what "recurrent" means. Recurrent esophageal stricture is defined as the inability to maintain target esophageal diameter beyond 4 weeks after the target diameter has been achieved.
  • Note (5) — what "refractory" means. Refractory esophageal stricture is defined as the inability to achieve target esophageal diameter despite receiving no fewer than 5 dilatation sessions performed at 2-week intervals.
Note (3) — this code is bigger than GERD. In VA's own words, DC 7206 "applies, but is not limited to, esophagitis, mechanical or chemical; Mallory Weiss syndrome (bleeding at junction of esophagus and stomach due to tears) due to caustic ingestion of alkali or acid; drug-induced or infectious esophagitis due to Candida, virus, or other organism; idiopathic eosinophilic, or lymphocytic esophagitis; esophagitis due to radiation therapy; esophagitis due to peptic stricture; and any esophageal condition that requires treatment with sclerotherapy." If one of those is your diagnosis, this is still your code. Do not walk away because the chart said "GERD."
★ "Recurrent" and "refractory" are defined, not judgment calls.
Hemorrhoids

Hemorrhoids — diagnostic code 7336

The current criteria. The old "mild or moderate" and "large or thrombotic" wording is gone from this code.

  • 0% — Assigned under 38 CFR 4.31 when the 10% criteria are not met.
  • 10% — Prolapsed internal hemorrhoids (pushed outside the body) with two or less episodes per year of thrombosis (a clot forming in the hemorrhoid); or external hemorrhoids with three or more episodes per year of thrombosis.
  • 20% — Internal or external hemorrhoids with persistent bleeding and anemia (low red blood cell count); or continuously prolapsed internal hemorrhoids with three or more episodes per year of thrombosis.
20% is the maximum schedular rating for hemorrhoids. That has not changed.
What did change: the old route to 20% through fissures was deleted from this code on May 19, 2024, and so was the old "mild or moderate" 0% level. Counting thrombosis episodes per year is now the test at both 10% and 20%, so the episode count needs to be in your medical record.
★ Count the episodes. Get them documented.
Before May 19, 2024

If your claim or appeal reaches back before that date

The old hemorrhoid criteria still matter for periods before the rewrite, and for many of those periods they are the better path.

The old DC 7336 text, which applies only to periods before May 19, 2024:
0% — Mild or moderate hemorrhoids.
10% — Large or thrombotic hemorrhoids, irreducible, with excessive redundant tissue and frequent recurrences.
20% — Persistent bleeding with secondary anemia, or hemorrhoids with fissures.
That old "or with fissures" route to 20% still applies to any appeal period before May 19, 2024, and it is usually the better path for those periods. If your claim or appeal covers time before that date, say so in writing and ask that the pre-May-19-2024 criteria be considered for that earlier period. Do not let anyone apply only the new wording to old time.
★ Old time, old rules. Raise it yourself.
Two rules that decide money

Zero percent, double-counting, and fissures

  • A code with no 0% line still gives a 0%. DC 7319 prints no 0% level. Under 38 CFR 4.31, "in every instance where the schedule does not provide a zero percent evaluation for a diagnostic code, a zero percent evaluation shall be assigned when the requirements for a compensable evaluation are not met." A 0% is not a denial. It is service connection on the books, and it is what you build an increase on later.
  • You cannot be paid twice for the same symptom. 38 CFR 4.114 does not bar combining DC 7336 with codes outside its list, but 38 CFR 4.14 still forbids evaluating the same manifestation twice. Because the DC 7336 20% criterion already includes anemia, a separate anemia evaluation for that same anemia is pyramiding and will be denied. A separate evaluation is available only for a genuinely distinct disability with distinct manifestations — so if you are going after a second evaluation, build it on a different disability, not on the same bleeding.
  • Anal fissure has no code of its own. Current 38 CFR 4.114 contains no diagnostic code for anal fissure — the word "fissure" does not appear in the section at all. That door is closed, and here is the next one: on or after May 19, 2024 a service-connected anal fissure is rated by analogy under 38 CFR 4.20 to the closest analogous code, such as DC 7332 (impairment of sphincter control), DC 7333 (stricture of rectum and anus), or DC 7335 (ano, fistula in). Which one fits depends on your facts. For any period before May 19, 2024, the old DC 7336 fissure route above is still there.
★ A closed door is not the end of the road.
If you hold an older rating

DC 7346 is not an escape hatch anymore

Hiatal hernia, diagnostic code 7346.

DC 7346 still exists and is now titled "Hiatal hernia and paraesophageal hernia," but its entire criteria now read: "Rate as esophagus, stricture of (DC 7203)." On or after May 19, 2024 that code routes to the same stricture-based scale as DC 7203 and DC 7206. The old symptom-based wording people remember under 7346 — heartburn, regurgitation, arm or shoulder pain — is not available going forward. If somebody tells you to file under 7346 to get around the stricture requirement, that advice is out of date.
★ Same scale, different door.
What I would do with this page. Read your own decision letter and find the diagnostic code VA used. Then read the level above the one you hold, word for word, and ask yourself what one document would close the gap — an EGD report, a count of thrombosis episodes, a provider's note using the regulation's own six symptoms. That single document is usually the whole difference. I bring the truth, simple and to the point. I have nothing left in this world but my word.